<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hrwhiz.com &#187; EEOC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hrwhiz.com/category/eeoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hrwhiz.com</link>
	<description>The Complete Human Resource Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 01:46:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are You Involved?</title>
		<link>http://hrwhiz.com/2010/10/are-you-involved/</link>
		<comments>http://hrwhiz.com/2010/10/are-you-involved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 14:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investigations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Other Departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Departments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V&J Foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace Investigations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrwhiz.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Believe it or not, there are a lot of companies out there that have HR people, but don’t use them.  For example, I often hear stories about companies who have Operations, not HR, handle the employee complaint process.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a recent example that I encountered.  An HR friend was interviewing for a job and called to ask my opinion about it.  As she reviewed the responsibilities, I thought the job sounded OK, except for the part where they told her that she wasn’t going to be handling employee relations.  Keep in mind that she was interviewing for the company’s sole HR job.  She was smart enough to ask who handled employee complaints.  Their response – the CEO or the Controller.  My advice – run like the wind!  And interestingly, the EEOC agrees with me.</p>
<p><a title="HR Morning - Human Resources News - HR News - HRMorning.com" href="http://www.hrmorning.com/" target="_blank">HR Morning</a> featured the recent EEOC v. V&amp;J Foods, Inc. case.  You can read more about the case <a title="HR Morning - Judge rules HR must be part of complaint process - HRMorning.com" href="http://www.hrmorning.com/judge-rules-hr-must-be-part-of-complaint-process/" target="_blank">here</a>.  Basically, the judge in the case said that “the company was at fault for not making it clear that the first option for a victim should be to contact the company’s human resources department with the complaint, and that the company should have had such a process in place, including contact info for HR.”</p>
<p>With no disrespect to the CEO’s of the world, there are too many people out there who think they can “also do HR.”  And too many things get brushed under the rug and/or covered-up when HR is not involved.  Lawsuits, like the one mentioned above, will continue to be the result.  So if you’re the company’s sole HR person and they tell you that you’re only going to recruit and handle the benefits – it might be time to start asking some questions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hrwhiz.com/2010/10/are-you-involved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sue Happy</title>
		<link>http://hrwhiz.com/2010/02/sue-happy/</link>
		<comments>http://hrwhiz.com/2010/02/sue-happy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 16:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Posts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Risk Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accident Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorneys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRST Van Expedited Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District Judge Linda Reade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HR Morning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Harassment Claims]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hrwhiz.com/?p=90</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do attorneys ever take a “sue first, ask questions later” approach?  I know that some do.  But I’d like to believe that it only happens in certain fields of practice – like ambulance-chasing accident attorneys.</p>
<p>But the “sue first, ask questions later” situation is exactly what a District Judge is accusing attorneys from the EEOC of doing.  You can read the entire story <a title="HR Morning - Tables turned! EEOC pays employer for mistaken lawsuit - HRMorning.com" href="http://www.hrmorning.com/tables-turned-eeoc-pays-employer/" target="_blank">here</a>, as reported by HR Morning.</p>
<p>The end result – get this – the company will receive $4.5M from the EEOC.  Do you know what is pretty interesting?  As HR Professionals, we always preach the importance of doing thorough investigations.  But it sounds like that is what the EEOC is accused of not doing.  It should be interesting to see how this plays out in court, as I&#8217;m sure the EEOC will appeal&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://hrwhiz.com/2010/02/sue-happy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

